Photo Forums - Bob Atkins Photography
Photo Forums - Bob Atkins Photography > Canon EOS Questions > macro lens advice 11-25-2015 08:18PM

 Forums Navigation
 •  Forums Home Page
 •  Comments and Feedback
 •  Canon EOS Questions
 •  Technical Optics
 •  Digital Darkroom
 Site Navigation
 •  Home Page
 •  Digital
 •  Reviews
 •  Optics
 •  Articles

 •  Books
 •  Canon News
 •  Photo News
 •  Gallery

Sponsored Links

IMPORTANT: These forums are now closed but are available in "READ ONLY" mode in order to preserve the information contained in them. The forum search function works so you can search the existing posts.

New forums are avaliable here: Photo Forums . These forums were closed for security reasons since they were hacked and the code running them is no longer supported. The new forums are database backed, faster, have more features and are much more secure.

 You do not have new topic access  You do not have reply access

Posts: 3
macro lens advice

hi bob,
i need advice about a macro lens for my canon eos 400D body
canon ef-s 60 mm macro f2.8 USM vs canon ef 100 mm macro f2.8 USM
wich one is more usefull on a 1.6 x crop sensor.
10x in advance

2-23-2008 12:22PM
Bob Atkins
Moderator and Administrator

Posts: 1062

Well, they both go to 1:1 magnification without any additional lenses or extension tubes and they are both f2.8, so they are pretty similar lenses as far as functionality goes.

The 100mm giives you a bit more working distance. It goes to 1:1 at 31cm, while the 60/2.8 goes to 1:1 at 20cm. The 100mm macro covers a full 35mm frame while the EF-S 60/2.8 macro only covers the APS-C frame.

The EF-S 60/2.8 is considerably smaller and lighter and it's also over $100 cheaper.

If it was me, and I wasn't thinking of upgrading to a full frame camera anytime soon, I think I'd go for the EF-S 60/2.8 macro USM, based on size, weight and cost. It's a very sharp lens.

If I was thinking of getting a 5D or other full frame body at some stage (or if I still wanted to shoot film), or if I really needed a little extra shooting distance, but didn't mind the extra size, weight or cost, I'd go for the EF 100/2.8 macro USM.

Another small advantage of the EF-S 60/2.8 macro is that it can double as a portrait lens. A 100mm lens on an APS-C body is a bit long for portrait work unless you stand at quite a distance from your subject.

Last edited by Bob Atkins on 2-23-2008 05:28PM
2-23-2008 05:28PM
 You do not have new topic access  You do not have reply access
Page: 1

Sponsored Links

  Recent Reviews:
  • Tamron 18-250 Review
  • Tokina 12-24/4 Review
  • EOS 30D - Full Review
  • Canon EF 17-85/4-5.6 IS
  • Canon EF 10-22/3.5-4.5
  • Canon EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS
  • Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT
  • Canon EOS 20D
  • 20D and Rebel (XT) Lenses
  • Tamron 28-75/2.8

1 online in last 5 min > 1 Guests, 0 Members


Username: Password: Remember me:

NavBoard 2.6.0
by bryan986 © 2002-2003
< Homepage > Newest member: closed, Members: 1281
Threads: 893, Replies: 2038, Total: 2931

[ Exec time: 0.036 | Files queried: 27 | Dirs queried: 901 | File writes: 3 ]