Photo Forums - Bob Atkins Photography
home
register
 
search
Photo Forums - Bob Atkins Photography > Technical Optics > 10-22mm 5-5-2016 12:03PM

 Forums Navigation
 •  Forums Home Page
 •  Comments and Feedback
 •  Canon EOS Questions
 •  Technical Optics
 •  Digital Darkroom
 Site Navigation
 •  Home Page
 •  Digital
 •  Reviews
 •  Optics
 •  Articles

 •  Books
 •  Canon News
 •  Photo News
 •  Gallery
 •  EOS FAQ

Sponsored Links

IMPORTANT: These forums are now closed but are available in "READ ONLY" mode in order to preserve the information contained in them. The forum search function works so you can search the existing posts.

New forums are avaliable here: BobAtkins.com Photo Forums . These forums were closed for security reasons since they were hacked and the code running them is no longer supported. The new forums are database backed, faster, have more features and are much more secure.

 You do not have new topic access  You do not have reply access
tmcman







Registered
Posts: 11
10-22mm


I've owned a 10-22 for about 6 months now.
I love what I can do with it on my 30D.
Especially good for high school sports where I'm
on the floor 5 or 10 feet from the action.

Just read your review of the 10-22.
The brick wall pic was amazingly square.
When I get people near the edge of the frame
at 10mm they look very "stretched out."
Is there a problem with my lens
that I should send it in for service?

Thanks for your help.

2-22-2008 09:36AM
Profile
Bob Atkins
Moderator and Administrator






Administrator
Posts: 1062


No. Your lens is perfectly fine. What you are seeing is simply the consequence of a very wideangle rectilinear lens.

Rectilinear lenses keep straight lines straight, but the wider they are the more "stretched" subjects at the edges of the frame become. It's a consequence of the optical "mapping" of the lens, i.e. the way it translates what is in front of it onto a small piece of film or a small optical sensor.

If you use a fisheye lens, you don't get the stretching at the edges of the frame, but straight lines become curved, so you get a different type of "distortion".

You can see some sample images on this page:
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/wide-angle-lenses-2.html
which illustrate the point.

The EF-S 10-22/3.5-4.5 USM is a remarkably good lens, and as you've found has very low geometric distortion for such a wideangle lens. However at 10mm you probably don't want to have people near the edges of the frame because of the way all such lenses stretch the image there.



Last edited by Bob Atkins on 2-22-2008 10:53AM
2-22-2008 10:49AM
Profile
 You do not have new topic access  You do not have reply access
 
Page: 1

Sponsored Links


  Recent Reviews:
  • Tamron 18-250 Review
  • Tokina 12-24/4 Review
  • EOS 30D - Full Review
  • Canon EF 17-85/4-5.6 IS
  • Canon EF 10-22/3.5-4.5
  • Canon EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS
  • Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT
  • Canon EOS 20D
  • 20D and Rebel (XT) Lenses
  • Tamron 28-75/2.8

Information
2 online in last 5 min > 2 Guests, 0 Members

Navigation:

Username: Password: Remember me:

NavBoard 2.6.0
by bryan986 © 2002-2003
< Homepage > Newest member: closed, Members: 1281
Threads: 893, Replies: 2038, Total: 2931

[ Exec time: 0.033 | Files queried: 24 | Dirs queried: 901 | File writes: 3 ]