All images © Bob Atkins

3.jpg

This website is hosted by:
Host Unlimited Domains on 1 Account

4.jpg

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
Web www.bobatkins.com
*
+  The Canon EOS and Photography Forums
|-+  Photography Forums
| |-+  Technical Questions on Photography and Optics
| | |-+  Lines per mm. in relation to magnification factors.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Lines per mm. in relation to magnification factors.  (Read 4678 times)  bookmark this topic!
alanscape
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


Lines per mm. in relation to magnification factors.
« on: January 04, 2009, 07:45:07 AM »

I have downloaded pages from http://adaptall-2.com/lenses and would like to know the following:-

When comparing lpm from the tables illustrated, how critical is the difference between.... RESOLUTION at xxmm at 1:48 magnification
                                                                                                               and... RESOLUTION at xxmm at 1:50 magnification?

I appreciate that what makes a 'good' lens is not always its resolving power and that there are other considerations but my curiosity
is aroused by the difference between say... the Tamron SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (#19AH) and the 70-210mm f/3.5-4 (#46A) in relation to the 'Modern Photo.' quoted charts contained in the tests/descriptions.

Can anyone shed some light on this please?
Logged
Bob Atkins
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1198


Re: Lines per mm. in relation to magnification factors.
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2009, 10:48:20 AM »

There should be no significant difference.

Lens performance is usually weakly linked to focus distance. A lens may perform better when focused at infinity the when focused at 3ft for example. Magnification ratio depends on focus distance, but the difference between 48:1 and 50:1 is so small that you would not expect resolution to me measurabley affected.

BTW your link doesn't lead to a valid page on that website, but I'm pretty sure that I understand correctly what you are seeing there.
Logged
Pages: [1]    
Print
« previous next »
Jump to: