
[Updated July 2010 - All tables revised to reflect current ratings, text revised to reflect new data]
Here is a list of the best lenses from Canon, Sigma, Tamron and Tokina as determined by user opinions from my "Lensplay" website. Of course there are many criteria for what's the best lens but here there are three sets of "best lens" data sorted by both price and overall rating. Just because a lens doesn't appear on the "best lens" list doesn't mean it's not a good lens of course. For example less popular lenses may not appear because they have not received enough ratings to qualify (at least 10 are needed before a lens will be rated as a "best lens").

Over on my other website, Lensplay.com I've been running an experimental database of lenses for Canon EOS bodies. Readers of the site were invited to give their own ratings on lenses on a scale of 5 to 10 which is fully explained on the Lensplay Ratings page. Briefly they are:
Rating below a 5 are reserved for me to assign to really bad lenses, though I haven't yet really found anything worth less than a 5 in a modern lens. I restricted users from giving anything less than a 5 rating to a lens because no lens in the database is that bad and ratings below a 5 would probably represent some sort of grudge that the user had against the lens maker (or maybe me!), or a deliberate attempt to skew the ratings, not the true quality of the lens.
As of July 2009 here are currently 219 different lenses in the database with 13900 user ratings by 6513 different users. In the last year around 2500 new ratings have been added by about 1400 new users, so the database is growing well.
Of course users don't scientifically test lenses. They don't shoot resolution test charts and calculate MTF. They use the lens and if they are happy with it, they give it a good rating. So the user rating combine technical quality with probably some subjective bias on the part of the user about how much they like the lens and the results it gives them. Actually that's probably a better way of judging a lens than a purely technical test. It gives a better feeling of whether the average user of the lens is happy with it.
As with every community activity there will always be some members of the community who like to "mess with the numbers" and hand out great ratings to lousy lenses or lousy ratings to great lenses. Because of this only lenses rated by 10 or more users are included here, plus the method of calculating the overall rating looks and accounts for "spoilers" based on a number of parameters (which I'm not going to reveal).
I think the results are a pretty accurate reflection of user's feelings about the lenses. There are no lenses included that I'd have excluded and most of the lenses I would have picked are in the tables somewhere.
The listings on Lensplay.com are dynamic and show the results in real time. The tables here are static and reflect the results in the database in July. The previous list was from December 2009 and there really haven't been any significant changes since then except for the appearance of a few recently released or updated lenses. This is a good thing in that it shows that what were seen as good lenses still are seen as good lenses. If all the lenses in the list were different, there would be something to worry about!. The links will take you to a page on Lensplay.com with the full lens specifications and (usually) a few extra comments on the lens. The prices for lenses which are no longer available new are estimates of what you might expect to pay on the used market for a lens in good condition
So here are the top 20 lenses based on user ratings with no regard to cost (note that only lenses with 10 or more ratings are listed)
UPDATED: December 2009
| Lens (click on link for full data) | Average User Rating |
# of User Ratings |
Price |
| 1 - Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM | 9.8 | 15 | 2299 |
| 2 - Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM | 9.8 | 413 | 1000 |
| 3 - Canon EF 100mm f2.8L IS Macro USM | 9.8 | 86 | 1050 |
| 4 - Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x | 9.7 | 53 | 830 |
| 5 - Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM | 9.7 | 165 | 4000 |
| 6 - Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM | 9.7 | 204 | 1135 |
| 7 - Canon EF 85mm f1.2L USM Mark II | 9.7 | 226 | 1840 |
| 8 - Canon EF 200/1.8L USM | 9.7 | 131 | 3000 |
| 9 - Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM | 9.6 | 231 | 660 |
| 10 - Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM | 9.6 | 103 | 5500 |
| 11 - Canon EF 70-200mm f4.0L IS USM | 9.6 | 396 | 1250 |
| 12 - Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 | 9.6 | 70 | 1100 |
| 13 - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | 9.6 | 343 | 470 |
| 14 - Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM | 9.6 | 55 | 6600 |
| 15 - Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM | 9.6 | 468 | 1700 |
| 16 - Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L IS USM | 9.5 | 54 | 7200 |
| 17 - Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | 9.5 | 371 | 990 |
| 18 - Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L USM | 9.5 | 77 | 1500 |
| 19 - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | 9.5 | 300 | 375 |
| 20 - Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | 9.4 | 142 | 1100 |
The first thing you'll probably notice is that all of the top 20 are Canon lenses.
The second thing you may notice is that 17 out of the top 20 lenses are primes. In these new (July 2010) ratings the new EF 70-200/2.8L IS II is the highest rated lens, which is somewhat unusual since in the past prime lenses have always topped the list. However the sample size is small for the EF 70-200/2.8L IS II (only 15 reviews), so I'd reserve judgment on whether it's really better than the 135/2.0. It's certainly very, very good though. It's interesting to see a non-L, EF-S zoom on the list, the EF-S 17-55/2.8L IS is now at #17 (up from #19 six months ago).
Of course, not everyone can afford a lens several thousands of dollars, so let's take a look at what the highest rated lenses under around $600 are. Some prices may have crept up a little since the database was last updated which is why I say under around $600
UPDATED: July 2010
| Lens (click on link for full data) | Average User Rating |
# of User Ratings |
Price |
| 1 - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | 9.6 | 343 | 470 |
| 2 - Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | 9.5 | 300 | 375 |
| 3 - Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM | 9.4 | 106 | 390 |
| 4 - Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 USM Macro | 9.4 | 218 | 370 |
| 5 - Tamron SP AF 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro | 9.4 | 113 | 489 |
| 6 - Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM | 9.4 | 368 | 590 |
| 7 - Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f2.8 XR Di-II LD Asph. IF | 9.3 | 254 | 450 |
| 8 - Canon EF 28-80mm f/2.8-4 L USM | 9.2 | 28 | 500 |
| 9 - Tokina 100mm f/2.8 AT-X M100 AF Pro D Macro | 9.2 | 24 | 400 |
| 10 - Canon EF 20-35mm f2.8L | 9.1 | 28 | 500 |
| 11 - Tokina AF 12-24mm f/4 AT-X 124AF Pro DX | 9.1 | 118 | 490 |
| 12 - Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM | 9.1 | 16 | 499 |
| 13 - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | 9.1 | 412 | 320 |
| 14 - Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro | 9.1 | 92 | 240 |
| 15 - Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro | 9.1 | 79 | 399 |
| 16 - Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 | 9.1 | 124 | 230 |
| 17 - Canon EF 100-300/5.6L | 8.9 | 28 | 300 |
| 18 - Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro | 8.9 | 54 | 325 |
| 19 - Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM | 8.9 | 129 | 449 |
| 20 - Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 | 8.8 | 67 | 260 |
Again primes top the list and 14 out of the twenty lenses are primes. Macro primes are very sharp and in fact 7 out of 20 of these lenses are macro lenses.
But suppose even $600 is too much to pay for a lens, what can you get for under $300 (includes some discontinued lenses at typical used prices). Note that some prices may have crept up a little since the database was last updated which is why I say under around $300
UPDATED: July 2010
| Lens (click on link for full data) | Average User Rating |
# of User Ratings |
Price |
| 1 - Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro | 9.1 | 92 | 240 |
| 2 - Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 | 9.1 | 124 | 230 |
| 3 - Canon EF 100-300/5.6L | 8.9 | 28 | 300 |
| 4 - Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 | 8.8 | 67 | 260 |
| 5 - Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro | 8.8 | 60 | 269 |
| 6 - Vivitar 100mm f/3.5 Macro | 8.8 | 22 | 150 |
| 7 - Canon EF 50mm f1.8 | 8.7 | 177 | 150 |
| 8 - Canon EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS | 8.6 | 93 | 265 |
| 9 - Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II | 8.5 | 409 | 100 |
| 10 - Canon EF 70-210mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | 8.5 | 51 | 200 |
| 11 - Canon EF 28-70mm f3.5-4.5 | 8.5 | 31 | 70 |
| 12 - Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 | 8.4 | 90 | 290 |
| 13 - Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Zoom Macro II | 8.3 | 37 | 200 |
| 14 - Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 IS | 8.2 | 121 | 199 |
| 15 - Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM | 8.2 | 145 | 230 |
| 16 - Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro | 8.2 | 65 | 200 |
| 17 - Sigma 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG Macro | 8 | 53 | 299 |
| 18 - Tamron AF55-200mm f4-5.6 Di -II Macro LD | 8 | 26 | 175 |
| 19 - canon EF 35-135mm f4-5.6 USM | 8 | 21 | 150 |
| 20 - Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 USM | 7.9 | 30 | 80 |
Again, the top 4 lenses are all primes, and 2 out of the 4 are macro lenses
It's pretty clear that if you have a limited budget and you demand the best in optical quality, you can get it if you're prepared to give up the convenience of zooms
If you found this article interesting, please share it with others: