Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT Hands-on Review (EOS 350D)
Above is a shot of the Digital Rebel XT in black with the EF-S 18-55/3.5-5.6 Kit lens attached. I think it looks better than the silver version shown down below.
General ImpressionsIt's small. Significantly smaller than the 20D. In fact on the verge of being too small for me. Now I'm 6ft tall and I have much larger hands than someone who is 5ft tall, so comments about size are relative. However I wouldn't want to see it get any smaller! The camera seems less "substantial" than the 20D, probably because of the light weight and more "plastic" finish. The 20D has textured rubber grips. The Digital Rebel XT is slightly roughened plastic.
Rear view of Digital Rebel XT in Silver
I find the menu screens a little less convenient than on the 20D and the menus are a little harder to read in daylight, because they are slightly "grayed out" until selected. The menu structure resembles that of Powershot cameras with several selectable "pages" of settings, whereas the 20D has all the options in a long list on one page. To get from a setting in one page to a setting in another, you have to scroll up to the top of the page, then over to the next page, then down to the menu item using the 4 direction buttons on the back of the camera. With the 20D you just turn the rear control dial to get to any item.
Just playing briefly with the camera it's evident that some things you can do on the 20D using control buttons and dials, you have to do on the Digital Rebel XT by going into menus and selecting options. This is slower and less convenient, but at least you can do them (you couldn't on the 300D without hacking the firmware).
Here are some of the main features of the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT:
Image QualityThis is the $64,000 question. How does the image quality of the Digital Rebel XT compare to that of the EOS 20D? Well, I took a few shots with both cameras in normal daylight set to the same ISO, parameter settings (contrast, sharpness, saturation etc.) and using the same lens.
My conclusion is that both cameras produce images of essentially the same quality, both at ISO100 and at ISO 1600. Color and noise levels were very similar indeed. Without doing scientific tests, they look identical, even at 200% enlargement. Any fears about higher noise or lower sharpness than the EOS 20D seem totally unfounded.
ShutterQuite a few people have commented on the difference in shutter sound of the Digital Rebel XT and EOS 20D. Below are plots of the recorded audio of each shutter.
Image NoiseHere's a set of images showing noise levels at various ISO settings, from 100-1600 for the Digital Rebel XT and from 100-3200 for the EOS 20D. These are shots of a gray card and each is a 100% crop from the center of the image.
As you can see, noise levels are very similar. If there are differences, they're too small to matter.
Image ResolutionBelow are two shots which are 200% crops from the center of the image of a resolution test chart, shot with a Canon EF 300/4L at f8.
It's pretty clear that there's no significant difference in resolution between the 8.2MP EOS 20D and the 8MP Digital Rebel XT.
Continuous ShootingI checked the frame rate on the Digital Rebel XT to see if it met the Canon spec of 3 frames/second. Below are the first and last shots of a 9 frame burst (large/fine JPEGS). That's as much as the XT buffer holds.
As you can see the 9 frames took just about 3 seconds, so it does indeed shoot at 3 frames/second.
© Copyright Bob Atkins All Rights Reserved